• Chỉ mục bởi
  • Năm xuất bản
LIÊN KẾT WEBSITE

A methodological comparison of head-cut based gully erosion susceptibility models: Combined use of statistical and artificial intelligence

Arabameri A. Department of Geomorphology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 36581-17994, Iran|
Bui D.T. University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Netherlands| Lombardo L. Department of Geography, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, United States| Tiefenbacher J.P. Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Choongmu-gwan, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05006, South Korea| Pradhan B. School of Systems, Management and Leadership, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia|

Geomorphology Số , năm 2020 (Tập 359, trang -)

DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107136

Tài liệu thuộc danh mục: Scopus

English

English

Từ khóa: accuracy assessment; artificial intelligence; comparative study; erosion rate; GIS; gully erosion; land degradation; model test; model validation; prediction; spatial distribution; statistical analysis; watershed; Iran
Tóm tắt tiếng anh
A GIS-based hybrid approach for gully erosion susceptibility mapping (GESM) in the Biarjamand watershed in Iran is presented. A database comprised of 15 geo-environmental factors (GEFs) was compiled and used to predict the spatial distribution of 358 gully locations; 70% (251) of which were extracted for training and 30% (107) for validation. A Dempster-Shafer (DS) statistical model was employed to map susceptibility. Next, the results of four kernels (binary logistic, reg logistic, binary logitraw, and reg linear) of a boosted regression tree (BRT) model were combined to increase the efficiency and accuracy of the mapping. Area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC), true skill statistic (TSS) and efficiency (E) metrics were used to rank the five validated models. The results show that elevation and distance to road play crucial roles in gullying. Integrating BRT and DS enhanced prediction accuracy. Among the four BRT kernels, binary logistic performed best (AUROC of 0.886, TSS of 0.854 and E equal to 0.880). The worst results were produced by the individual DS model (AUROC = 0.849, TSS = 0.774 and E = 0.834). The hybrid binary logistic-BRT and DS map categorized 14.50% of the study area as having very-low susceptibility, 16.99% low susceptibility, 22.77% moderate susceptibility, 24.12% high susceptibility, and 21.59% very-high susceptibility. � 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Xem chi tiết