• Chỉ mục bởi
  • Năm xuất bản
LIÊN KẾT WEBSITE

Comparative study of multilayer perceptron-stochastic gradient descent and gradient boosted trees for predicting daily suspended sediment load: The case study of the Mississippi River, U.S.

Shadkani Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran|
Shahab S. (57221738247) | Amirhosein (57191408081); Band | Sajjad (57214824027); Mosavi Future Technology Research Center, College of Future, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou, Yunlin, 64002, China| Saeed (55308113100); Hashemi Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Viet Nam| Akram (26648090600); Samadianfard Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam| Sadra (57214818960); Abbaspour Environmental Quality, Atmospheric Science and Climate Change Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam|

International Journal of Sediment Research Số 4, năm 2021 (Tập 36, trang 512-523)

ISSN: 10016279

ISSN: 10016279

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.10.001

Tài liệu thuộc danh mục:

Article

English

Từ khóa: Mississippi River; United States; comparative study; fluvial deposit; machine learning; sediment transport; stochasticity; suspended sediment
Tóm tắt tiếng anh
Monitoring sediment transport is essential for managing and maintaining rivers. Estimation of the sediment load in rivers is fundamental for the study of sediment movement, erosion, and flood control. In the current study, three machine learning models—multi-layer perceptron (MLP), multi-layer perceptron-stochastic gradient descent (MLP-SGD), and gradient boosted tree (GBT)—were utilized to estimate the suspended sediment load (SSL) at the St. Louis (SL) and Chester (CH) stations on the Mississippi River, U.S. Four evaluation criteria including the Correlation Coefficient (CC), Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Scatter Index (SI), and Willmott's Index (WI) were utilized to evaluate the performance of the used models. A sensitivity analysis of the models to the input variables revealed that the current day discharge variable had the most effect on the SSL at both stations, but in the absence of current-day discharge data (Qt), a combination of input parameters including SSLt−3,SSLt−2,SSLt−1,Qt−3,Qt−2,Qt−1 can be used to estimate the SSL. The comparative outcomes indicated the high accuracy of MLP-SGD-5 model with a CC of 0.983, SI of 0.254, WI of 0.991, and NSE of 0.967 at station CH and the MLP-SGD-6 model with a CC of 0.933, SI of 0.576, WI of 0.961, and NSE of 0.867, respectively, at station SL. The results of MLP models were improved by SGD optimization. Therefore, the MLP-SGD method is recommended as the most accurate model for SSL estimation. © 2020 International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation / the World Association for Sedimentation and Erosion Research

Xem chi tiết