Trang chủ    Giới thiệu    Danh mục công bố    Thống kê công bố    Liên hệ   
Trang chủ Công bố quốc tế • Giới thiệu     • Tài liệu hướng dẫn
  • Chỉ mục bởi
  • Năm xuất bản
LIÊN KẾT WEBSITE

Coverage of health information by different sources in communities: Implication for COVID-19 epidemic response

Tran B.X. Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam|
Ho C.S.H. | Ho R.C.M. | Latkin C.A. | Van Vu G. Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, 119074, Singapore| Van Truong D. Institute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119077, Singapore| Do K.N. Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore| Tran T.D. Respiratory Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam| Nguyen T.H. Department of Internal Medicine, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam| Nghiem S.H. Department of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, 700000, Viet Nam| Phung D.T. Demography and Medical statistics, Faculty of Public Health, Danang University of Medical Technology and Pharmacy, Da Nang, 550000, Viet Nam| Vu G.T. Department of Pharmacy, Dai Nam University, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam| Phan H.T. Centre for Applied Health Economics (CAHE), Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia| Pham H.Q. School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia| Nguyen T.H. Center of Excellence in Evidence-Based Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh, 700000, Viet Nam| Do T.T.T. Faculty of Medicine, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Viet Nam| Le X.T.T. Institute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Viet Nam| Le H.T. Vietnam Young Physicians’ Association, Hanoi, 100000, Viet Nam| Thai P.K. Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia| Dang A.K. Bloomberg, School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States|

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Số 10, năm 2020 (Tập 17, trang -)

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103577

Tài liệu thuộc danh mục: ISI, Scopus

English

English

Từ khóa: community health worker; COVID-19; disease control; epidemic; factor analysis; guideline; health policy; health services; sampling; training; viral disease; access to information; adult; Article; clinical feature; construct validity; coronavirus disease 2019; cross-sectional study; epidemic; exploratory factor analysis; female; health auxiliary; health care organization; health care personnel; health care policy; human; information dissemination; information service; Internet; knowledge; male; mass medium; medical information; medical student; practice guideline; prevention and control; social network; Viet Nam; Betacoronavirus; Coronavirus infection; pandemic; questionnaire; virus pneumonia; young adult; Viet Nam; Adult; Betacoronavirus; Coronavirus Infections; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Health Personnel; Humans; Male; Mass Media; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Students, Medical; Surveys and Questionnaires; Vietnam; Young Adult
Tóm tắt tiếng anh
Health personnel and community workers are at the front line of the COVID-19 emergency response and need to be equipped with adequate knowledge related to epidemics for an effective response. This study aimed to identify the coverage of COVID-19 health information via different sources accessed by health workers and community workers in Vietnam. A cross-sectional study using a web-based survey was carried out from January to February 2020 in Vietnam. Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) was used for recruiting participants. We utilized the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to examine the construct validity of the questionnaire. A higher percentage of participants knew about “Clinical and pathogen characteristics of COVID-19”, compared to “Regulations and policies related to COVID-19”. The percentage of participants accessing the information on “Guidelines and policies on prevention and control of COVID-19” was the lowest, especially among medical students. “Mass media and peer-educators” channels had a higher score of accessing COVID-19 information, compared to “Organizations/ agencies/ associations” sources. Participants consumed most of their COVID-19 information via “Internet, online newspapers, social networks”. Our findings indicate an urgency to re-design training programs and communication activities for a more effective dissemination of information related to the COVID-19 epidemic or epidemics in general. © 2020 by the authors.

Xem chi tiết