• Chỉ mục bởi
  • Năm xuất bản
LIÊN KẾT WEBSITE

GIS-based machine learning algorithms for gully erosion susceptibility mapping in a semi-arid region of Iran

Lei X. College of Geology and Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, China|
Mosavi A. Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, 66177-15175, Iran| Shirzadi A. Board Member of Department of Zrebar Lake Environmental Research, Kurdistan Studies Institute, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, 66177-15175, Iran| Shahabi H. Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, 66177-15175, Iran| Costache R. National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Bucures, ti-Ploies, ti Road, 97E, 1st District, Bucharest, 013686, Romania| Shahabi H. Research Institute of the University of Bucharest, 90-92 Sos. Panduri, 5th District, Bucharest, 013686, Romania| Kariminejad N. Department of remote sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 5166616471, Iran| Janizadeh S. Department of Watershed and Arid Zone Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, 49189-434, Iran| Avand M. Department of Watershed Management Engineering and Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran| Chen W. Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi'an, 710021, China|

Remote Sensing Số 15, năm 2020 (Tập 12, trang -)

DOI: 10.3390/RS12152478

Tài liệu thuộc danh mục: ISI, Scopus

English

English

Từ khóa: Data mining; Decision trees; Erosion; Geographic information systems; Landforms; Learning algorithms; Logistic regression; Mapping; Area under the ROC curve; Kernel logistic regression; Reproducibilities; Semi-arid region; State of the art; Susceptibility mapping; Training dataset; Validation process; Machine learning
Tóm tắt tiếng anh
In the present study, gully erosion susceptibility was evaluated for the area of the Robat Turk Watershed in Iran. The assessment of gully erosion susceptibility was performed using four state-of-the-art data mining techniques: random forest (RF), credal decision trees (CDTree), kernel logistic regression (KLR), and best-first decision tree (BFTree). To the best of our knowledge, the KLR and CDTree algorithms have been rarely applied to gully erosion modeling. In the first step, from the 242 gully erosion locations that were identified, 70% (170 gullies) were selected as the training dataset, and the other 30% (72 gullies) were considered for the result validation process. In the next step, twelve gully erosion conditioning factors, including topographic, geomorphological, environmental, and hydrologic factors, were selected to estimate gully erosion susceptibility. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to estimate the performance of the models. The results revealed that the RF model had the best performance (AUC = 0.893), followed by the KLR (AUC = 0.825), the CDTree (AUC = 0.808), and the BFTree (AUC = 0.789) models. Overall, the RF model performed significantly better than the others, which may support the application of this method to a transferable susceptibility model in other areas. Therefore, we suggest using the RF, KLR, and CDT models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping in other prone areas to assess their reproducibility. � 2020 by the authors.

Xem chi tiết