• Chỉ mục bởi
  • Năm xuất bản
LIÊN KẾT WEBSITE

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic response on aquaculture farmers in five countries in the Mekong Region

Lebel Unit for Social and Environmental Research, Department of Social Science and Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Suthep, Thailand|
Boripat (57190969147) | Michael (57188739061); Lebel | Liwa (23103817900); Akester | Phimphakan (36126495800); Pardthaisong | Tuantong (56311049300); Lebel Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Suthep, Thailand| Phouvin (55532991400); Jutagate Faculty of Agriculture, Ubon Ratchathani University, Mueang Si Khai, Thailand| Hap (33567984300); Phousavanh Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Laos, Vientiane, Laos| Nguyen (24333048000); Navy Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Phnom Penh, Cambodia| Khin Maung (57218338722); Thanh Phuong Can Tho University, Can Tho, Viet Nam| Louis (26643346600); Soe WorldFish, Yangon, Myanmar|

Aquaculture Economics and Management Số 3, năm 2021 (Tập 25, trang 298-319)

ISSN: 13657305

ISSN: 13657305

DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2021.1946205

Tài liệu thuộc danh mục:

Article

English

Từ khóa: Mekong River; consumption behavior; COVID-19; farmers knowledge; governance approach; livelihood; logistics; resource development
Tóm tắt tiếng anh
Public health measures aimed at reducing the spread of COVID-19 can have significant, unintended impacts on livelihoods. In this paper, we assess the impacts of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on aquaculture farmers in five countries in the Mekong Region. A total of 1,019 farmers were surveyed (June–August 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic reduced farmer mobility, disrupted input and produce logistics, and reduced consumer demand, which in turn, reduced net income relative to expectations and increased the likelihood of making a net loss in the first half of 2020. Large aquaculture farms were more likely to experience adverse impacts from higher input prices and lower fish market prices than small farms. Intensive and commercial farms were more likely to be affected by supplier and buyer logistic disruptions. Coping responses included adjustments to stocking practices, reducing labor inputs, finding new markets, drawing on savings, and borrowing money. Large farms were more likely to seek new markets and borrow money. Easier loan conditions and direct cash handouts by governments helped in some locations and were desired in others. Significant differences among countries in impacts and responses reflect market and trade dependencies, as well as government capacity and willingness to support the aquaculture industry. © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Xem chi tiết